Copyright © 2023 SGIS | Designed & Developed by Webiffy Web Solutions A unit of M/S EU4EAA
THE IB DIPLOMA PROGRAMME
Revised on 28th July -2023
At Sanjay Ghodawat International School we believe that assessment refers to the wide variety of methods or tools that educators use to evaluate, measure, and document the academic readiness, learning progress, skill acquisition, or educational needs of students. The focus of assessment practice is gathering and analyzing information as well as catering to the individual learning needs & requirements. At SGI School, teachers and students both collaborate to design the task as well as the tools for assessment.
Assessments act as the foundation on which to base our future planning and teaching strategies
Continuous assessment is a classroom strategy implemented by teachers to ascertain the knowledge, understanding and skills attained by pupils. Teachers administer assessments in a variety of ways over time, which allow them to observe multiple tasks and to collect information about what pupil knows, understand, and can do. These assessments are curriculum-based tasks previously taught in class. Continuous assessments take place frequently during the course time, it happens as a part of regular teacher student interactions. Feedbacks are received by the learners based on their performance. These feedbacks allow them to focus more on the topics they have not yet mastered. Continuous assessments help teachers to learn which student needs more attention and remediation. They also help the teacher to identify which pupils are ready to move on to more complex work. Continuous assessment ensures that all pupils make their learning progress throughout the school cycle and help to increase their academic achievement.
A type of assessment known as criterion referencing is practiced here. In this, the performance of an individual candidate is assessed on the basis of certain rubrics. Each criterion has its descriptions clearly indicating student’s level of performance and explanations of the same.
Formative assessments are often informal and ongoing process of assessing the students. It provides information to students and teachers that are used to improve teaching and learning. A wide range of meaningful formative assessment tasks are used to sharpen students’ skills, knowledge and understanding, culminating into summative assessment tasks.
Students acquire the skills of self-assessment, peer assessment and identify goals based on their teacher’s appraisal. The formative assessment process provides information needed to adjust teaching and learning while they are still happening. It guides teachers in making decisions about future instructions. A few examples of formative assessment methods are:
Summative assessment is a cumulative assessment usually occurring at the end of a term. Summative assessments in the form of term end assessment/mock assessment replicate the IB assessment for different components in the exams. Here in SGIS, summative assessment follows from an accumulation of evidences collected over time, as in a collection of student work. These assessments are designed to provide information on students’ achievement levels and assess students’ understanding and knowledge against some standards. These standards are designed in alignment with the IB units and assessed in regard to an appropriate DP subject guides and its respective objectives. Summative Assessments in the form of term end assessments occur after every five months and mock exam occur after the end of the syllabus.
TOK encourages critical thinking and inquiring into process of knowing. It is centered on the question
`How do we know what we claim to know?’ It is designed to help students to reflect on and further develop their thinking skills, they have acquired in other subjects. The central features of the Theory of knowledge course are critical analysis questions called Knowledge questions.
The assessment model in Theory of Knowledge has two components, both of which should be completed within the 100 hours designated for the course. TOK is assessed through an essay of 1600 words on prescribed titles by the IB and an exhibition on one of 35 prescribed prompts. Both the essay and the exhibition are assessed using global impression marking. The essay contributes 67% of the final mark and the exhibition contributes 33% of the final mark. TOK inculcates all the learner’s profiles in the students and develops international mindedness.
An Extended Essay is intended to be an academic-style research on a topic chosen from one of the IB subjects. The maximum word count is 4,000 (plus an additional 500 words for the reflections) on Reflection on Planning and Progress form [RPPF] that is submitted with the Extended Essay. It is mandatory to submit three compulsory reflections to the supervisor. The reflections should be focused on conceptual understanding, decision-making and engagement with data, the research process, time management and methodology, appropriateness of sources and successes and challenges.
IB recommends approximately 40 hours accomplishing the task. It is a mandatory requirement that all essays are academically honest, all the work is genuinely stemming from your own efforts.
Students should receive three to five hours in-school supervisory support towards the completion of Extended Essay. A supervisor is expected to provide advice and support but not prescribe questions or edit any work produced.
Creativity – Activity – Service is at the heart of the Diploma Programme. It enables students to live the IB learner profile in real and practical ways, to grow as unique individuals and to recognise their role in relation to others. CAS is organized around the three strands of Creativity, Activity and Service:
Creativity – Arts and other experiences that involve creative thinking.
Activity – Physical exertion contributing to a healthy lifestyle, complementing academic work elsewhere in the IB Diploma Programme.
Service – an unpaid and voluntary exchange that has a learning benefit for the student.
Students of SGIS will be involved in CAS experiences and projects, regularly for 18 months in their diploma programme.
All students are expected to maintain and complete a CAS portfolio as evidence of their engagement with CAS. The CAS portfolio is meant to be a collection of evidence that showcases the overall experience and will be a source of pride for the student. Students should include reflections in their CAS portfolio that give evidence to achieving each of the CAS learning outcomes.
Within the IB Diploma classes, assessment provides feedback to the students and teachers and thus modifies both the teaching and learning process. It is built into the lessons, such that the process is embedded in all aspects of learning. The continuous feedback that is obtained as a result is essential for goal setting and establishing future targets.
The internal assessment is internally marked by the teacher in-charge of the subject and externally moderated. All IBDP subjects have an internal assessment component (whether written or oral), which student must complete during the course of two years.
The SGIS calendar provides the timeline for the completion of internal assessment. Students are expected to follow the calendar strictly as this document is collaboratively agreed by all the teachers and management.
Teacher assessment in different subjects includes:
At the end of diploma programme students will appear for IBDP external examinations according to the IB guidelines. The dates of the examinations are decided by IBO.
DP assessment procedures measure the extent to which students have mastered advanced academic skills in fulfilling these goals, for example:
Basic skills are also assessed, including:
Other written tasks, written assignments in languages, Extended Essays, etc., DP Coordinator will discuss and finalize the submission dates for the same with respective subject teachers, TOK teachers and EE team. DP coordinator will send these assessments to IB examiners who will then grade these externally. The result of final IBDP examinations will be declared on 5th July.
IBDP programme is a two year programme. In SGIS each year is divided into two semesters. At the end of each semester, students take assessments apart from the internal assessments.
Assessment Structure:
Grade 11 | Grade 12 | |
AUG | 1 – Assessment | 1 – Assessment |
SEPT | 1 – Assessment | 1 – Assessment |
OCT | IA begins | IA |
NOV | End of Semester Exam | End of Semester Exam |
DEC | IA | |
JAN | 1 – Assessment | 1 – Assessment |
FEB | 1 – Assessment | 1 – Assessment |
MAR | IA | MOCK |
APR | End of Year Exam | MOCK |
MAY | IBDP Final Examination |
Following are the current Grading system followed by the school. The school has its own grading system which is applicable to the current running program in the school from classes 1 to 10. For assessment of the students of 11 and 12 following grades will also be used. This will help students and parents to know the progress of their wards from time to time. These are different than the official IBDP grading system. These are aligned with the grades 1-7 as per IBO.
Grade Awarded | % Scales from | Till score % | Remarks | IB Gradings |
A* | 90 | 100 | Excellent | 7 |
A | 80 | 89 | Very Good | 6 |
B | 70 | 79 | Good | 5 |
C | 60 | 69 | Above Average | 4 |
D | 50 | 59 | Average | 3 |
E | 40 | 49 | Poor | 2 |
U | 0 | 39 | Very Poor | 1 |
For TOK and EE, the IB has provided a predetermined grid which interprets the grades into points. It shows 3 points in total. These are based on the combination scores of TOK and EE.
TOK is graded on a scale of A to E, A being the highest. Extended Essay is also graded on the same scale.
CAS is assessed by the completion of the seven learning outcomes specified by the IB in the CAS guide. Description is given below.
TOK -EE MATRIX
For the purpose of reporting and feedback, the assessment criteria will be shared with all students and parents before first term of IBDP-1. A regular meeting with parents will be scheduled where parents will be invited to discuss the progress and development of their wards. Teacher will share the feedback, reflections and comments on the progress of students. A report card will be issued to every parent of IBDP after each term. Every component of subjects will be evaluated strictly as per their subject guides and rubrics. The student is given a comprehensive feedback about his/her level of achievement as per each grade descriptor.
The school will adhere to the IB guidelines for internal assessment and feedback. Once the written comments are given to the students for their work, they are expected to submit the final version to the teacher. The teacher must not provide any written comments, in any situation after giving the first draft comments.
Different forms of student’s works such as internal assessment, Extended Essay must not be aimed at major editing by the teacher. The teacher’s feedback aims only to encourage students to think, explore further and come up with their own views. The teacher’s feedback must be indicative in nature. SGIS strives to make students independent learners and empower them through feedback.
The IB Diploma will be awarded to a candidate provided all the following requirements have been met:
subject.
Grade 3 or below has been awarded not more than three times (HL or SL)
The candidate has gained 12 points or more on HL subjects (for candidates who register for four HL subjects, the three highest grades count). ● The candidate has gained 9 points or more on SL subjects (candidates who register for two SL subjects must gain at least 5 points at SL). Grades and Generic Grade Descriptors | ||||
Grade | Range | Descriptor | ||
7 | 85-100 | The student is consistent and has thorough understanding of the required knowledge and skills and the ability to apply them almost faultlessly in a wide variety of situations. The students consistently demonstrates originality, insight, and analytical thinking. The student product work of high quality. | , t es | |
6 | 75-84 | The student is consistent and has thorough understanding of the required knowledge and skills, and the ability to apply them in a wide variety of situations. The student consistently demonstrates originality, insight, and analytical thinking | ||
5 | 65-74 | Thorough understanding of the required knowledge and skills, and the ability to apply them in a variety of situations. The student occasionally demonstrates originality, insight, and analytical thinking. | ||
4 | 55-64 | General understanding of the required knowledge and skills, and the ability to apply them effectively in normal situations. There is occasional evidence of analytical thinking | ||
3 | 35-54 | Limited achievement against most of the objectives, or clear difficulties in some areas. The student demonstrates a limited understanding of the required knowledge and skills and is only able to apply them fully to normal situations with support. | ||
2 | 21-34 | Very limited achievement in terms of the objectives. The student has difficulty in understanding the required knowledge and skills and is unable to apply them fully to normal situations, even with support. | ||
1 | 20 and below | Minimal achievement in terms of the objectives | ||
Assignments and Homework
Assignments and homework are integral part of academic where students are expected to work diligently. Students have to complete subject assignments, Internal Assessment tasks, Extended Essay, TOK exhibition and Essay and CAS requirements to gain the Diploma Programme. Students have to work independently under the guidance of subject teachers. They have to finish the assignments and submit their work on or before the given deadlines by maintaining academic honesty. Usually students get time to finish their work / assignments during available free time in school but they can take the work home if not finished or not completed in school hours. It is the sole responsibility of the students to manage his/her time at home and make sure that student meets all the deadlines. Parents are expected to provide an appropriate work environment as their contribution in completing their assignments.
Special Education Needs refers to the students who are differently abled. It’s a child centered approach depending on the needs each child has. The Psychological Assessment of these children varies with the different development issues. Confidentiality of these children along with maintenance of legal and assessment records is mandatory. Psychologist has to conduct family therapies for these children with special needs in assisting them in different activities to be conducted by parents and teachers. The module for these children is activity oriented.
Coordinators and teachers are responsible for submitting requests for special arrangements. The assessing of SEN students will be as per the guidelines given by IBO as well as SGIS Inclusive Education Policy document-2022.
The policy is subject to review on a yearly basis in order to ensure it aligns with the standards and
practices of the IB. The DP Coordinator ensures that any new or updated documentation with regard
to the Assessment Policy provisions, which is published by the IB, will have its reflection in the school’s
working policy. The policy is reviewed at the general meeting of the DP Faculty held yearly and any
observations or suggestions from the DP staff shall be communicated to the DP Coordinator on an
ongoing basis.
IBO Diploma Programme Assessment Principles and Practice. Cardiff,: International Baccalaureate Organization, Nov. 2010. PDF.
IBO. Handbook of Procedures for the Diploma Programme. Geneva: International Baccalaureate Organization, Mar. 2022. PDF.
IBO. Handbook of Procedures for the Diploma Programme 2017. Geneva: International Baccalaureate Organization, Nov. 2016.
.
Sanjay Ghodawat International School is the most immaculate location and the optimum platform to transmit quality education through holistic approach founded in 2012 in Maharashtra.